ClioMake
Evaluate ClioMake with review evidence, not guesswork.
Run a structured pilot that turns real teaching briefs into resource packs, then review output quality, teacher approval status, usage, and procurement requirements before committing to a larger license.
Institution Sprint
For schools, departments, publishers, and education programs evaluating quality, governance, and scale.
1. Set success criteria
Choose subject area, learner level, review owners, quality criteria, and approval workflow.
2. Generate agreed packs
Create resource packs from real briefs with file-family and quality-report evidence.
3. Review before classroom use
Teachers or curriculum leads inspect content, answer keys, accessibility, and layout before release.
4. Decide with evidence
Receive usage, quality findings, risks, and recommendations for annual licensing or a larger rollout.
Pick the buying motion that matches your team.
Center Pilot, $499 USD
One-week proof for a tutoring center, microschool, or enrichment program that needs branded weekly resources and parent-facing materials.
Institution Sprint, $2,500 USD
Structured evaluation for departments, schools, publishers, or curriculum teams that need onboarding, quality evidence, and review records.
Annual Licensing
For teams ready for shared libraries, role-based review, recurring pack generation, usage reporting, and invoice/PO workflows.
What your team receives after a sprint.
Generated pack library
Approved pilot briefs and downloadable resource packs with worksheet, key, quiz, rubric, slides, accessible HTML, QTI/LMS file, SVG/3D source, and teacher brief where selected.
Artifact availability report
A file-family checklist that shows which promised artifacts were produced, which need regeneration, and which have been reviewed by a responsible educator.
Quality and standards evidence
Quality reports, standards-planning maps, teacher-review notes, and topic-specific evidence for the selected subject or jurisdiction.
Usage and workflow summary
Pack volume, common brief patterns, reviewer notes, turnaround observations, and recommendations for making generation repeatable across a team.
Procurement notes
Privacy, security, data-handling, accessibility, remake policy, and invoice or purchase-order requirements captured for the next buying step.
Scale recommendation
A go/no-go summary for annual licensing, center rollout, or a narrower follow-up sprint based on actual pilot artifacts rather than a slide deck promise.
What institutional buyers can request.
Privacy and data use
Plain-language summary of account data, uploaded source handling, retention, deletion, and AI data-use boundaries.
Security review
Hosting, access controls, authentication, logging, incident contact, and administrative review notes for your IT team.
DPA and vendor review
DPA review, vendor forms, invoice or purchase-order support, pilot scope, and annual license proposal on request.
Accessibility review
Output-format accessibility notes, HTML module behavior, teacher review checklist, and improvement plan for formal conformance documentation.
Human approval workflow
Clear boundary: generated educational materials should be reviewed by responsible educators before classroom use.
Curriculum alignment proof
Sample standards map and quality report can be included in a review packet for the selected subject and jurisdiction.
Bring one real unit or weekly program brief.
We will scope the pilot around the resources your team already needs, then produce reviewable files and an evidence packet for the buying decision.